This area does not yet contain any content.
« Incredible video | Main | FREE CAT LITTER!!! »
Saturday
May152010

My rings

Weeks ago I went to a jewelry store to have my engagement ring sized (it was at least 2 sizes too big) and have a wedding band made to fit around it's odd shape. I finally got a call Thursday night that they were ready and Jeff and I went to pick them up last night (and he picked out a band for himself which will be ready in a month). I was a little shocked at first when I put both rings on. It was not what I had pictured in my mind all these weeks. Then I realized the ring wasn't quite designed how I had asked. But here's why I don't think I mind so much - the goldsmith used larger diamonds than I had asked for. He was supposed to use the very small diamonds that are on the sides of the engagement ring. So it was quite a bit sparklier and BLING BLING than it was supposed to be. I was told to take them home, wear them, and bring them back if I'm not happy. What kind of girl brings back a ring and asks for smaller diamonds??? FORGET ABOUT IT. I am growing very attached to it just the way it is. :) (Here is a photo of the engagement ring on it's own).

Reader Comments (13)

I love the way it looks. I wouldn't change a thing! One less thing to worry about...

15 May 2010 | Unregistered Commenterjulia

stunning. truly stunning. happy you're enjoying the "mistake" :)

15 May 2010 | Unregistered Commentersunny

very nice. i love them. NOW TAKE THE BAND OFF.

15 May 2010 | Unregistered Commenterjenlovespugley

I love it! But I'm getting teary already and there are still a couple of months to go. Pass the tissues!!!

16 May 2010 | Registered Commentermidcenturyjo

so did you make the ring or is it antique? i thought it was antique... i'm confused :)

(btw it's so beautiful)

16 May 2010 | Unregistered Commenterdrey

:-)
Drey, the engagement ring is an antique, and it's likely not actually an engagement ring. It did not come with a wedding band so I had to have one made to match it.

16 May 2010 | Registered CommenterKiM

A beautiful misunderstanding indeed. :-)

19 May 2010 | Unregistered CommenterLynn

absolutely gorgeous and unique :)

28 May 2010 | Unregistered CommenterNat

Oh, so pretty! Congratulations Kim. I haven't checked in for quite a while...I have loads of catching-up/ogling to do.
And I like how there's two photos of your ring but ten of the new kitty litter set-up. Hilarious...and charming.
Again, congratulations & best wishes, A

29 May 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAMR

Thanks AMR! (I couldn't resist posting all those cat pics in the litter post because the longer I sat there with my camera the more kitties showed up to see what the hell was going on.)

29 May 2010 | Registered CommenterKiM

the ring is seamless. and beautiful.
and for the record, it won't be the last thing in your marriage that doesn't turn out the way you thought it would, but that you wouldn't change for anything. roll with the blings. :)

22 Jun 2010 | Unregistered CommenterPriscilla

:-) Thanks Priscilla

22 Jun 2010 | Registered CommenterKiM

This was truly the most beautiful - classic - art deco - tastefull - original ring i ever have seen! lucky you!

5 Jan 2011 | Unregistered CommenterTove

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.