This area does not yet contain any content.
« A budget makeover | Main | Reader request - bathroom inspiration »
Friday
Feb042011

It's not always black and white

Found something interesting when stalking this week. Architect designed renovation in St Kilda, Melbourne. Spacious modern extension, lovely courtyard garden leading to a rear garage/studio. Architect Matt Gibson. A quick click over to Mr Gibson's website and there is the house again but just a little different (after the jump). The rear is still the same (minus the modern stools, statues now complete the space). The family/TV room is still the same. Kitchen stools have changed but the bowl on the counter is still there. The biggest difference is the dining room. Chalk and cheese. Black and white. Definitely not the same. Not even the same taste. Then there is the striped living room which doesn't appear at all on the architect's site or fit the vibe of the house as depicted on Gibson's site. We do though on the architect's website get a chance to peek at the lovely front courtyard garden. So what has happened between the architect taking photos for his portfolio and the real estate agent snapping slightly blurry photos for the listing? Did the architect not like the client's aesthetic and did a little editing of furniture and spaces? Has the owner "matured" in taste over the time? After all we all change our minds over time when it comes to our rooms. Is it a divorce and the wife can finally go all girly ... still in black and white though? A girl who stalks the real estate listings and spends her time staring through the "virtual" curtains needs to know these things :) What's your theory?

And now from the achitect's website ....

  

  

Reader Comments (15)

I think the owners have done a little "design work" of their own!! For my taste, I prefer the architect's aesthetic but hey ... a house is a home and people should be able to put their own stamp on it!!

4 Feb 2011 | Unregistered Commentersarah

The TV room is definitely more lived in and I quite like that feel. It is nice when a design evolves organically that way. I detest the changes in the dining room, and what's going on in that stripy sitting room. It all looks like some kind of compromise.... for sure

4 Feb 2011 | Unregistered Commenterselina

wow, there is quite a difference...either way, i'll move in! how about the carrara marble counter...love!

4 Feb 2011 | Unregistered Commentercabbage rose

9th picture: Can you imagine having a relaxing chat with a friend in your backyard with Golden Man standing between you?? I laughed out loud! Otherwise gorgeous, smart renovation. I love all the outdoor spaces and living walls.

4 Feb 2011 | Unregistered CommenterSueE

I've long said I wished I'd married a chef. I love to eat, so what?
This post? Amazing. I think I shoulda married an architect.
Thank you for sharing. Bookmarked again. xoxo

4 Feb 2011 | Unregistered CommenterRLG

I like the modern design that the architect offers the space, but I feel (personal taste of course) that the decor is a little stale. It doesn't feel homey, it feels sterile and like a museum. But very interesting, considering all the lines and nicely placed windows. I feel the modern sleek design of the architecture needs to be complimented by some contrast in the decor, some color. Thanks for sharing.

4 Feb 2011 | Unregistered CommenterMaria Black

Oh la la... magnifique ! beautiful !!

4 Feb 2011 | Unregistered CommenterClaire

I think on the architect's side, it's more of a staging effect ( so it looks nice and pretty ), however on the real estate agent's side, it's more of a live-in look ( there are real people living inside ), it has soul and character though pefect it may not be.
But i agree with Selina, the owners should have kept the dining room as it is, what a shame .....

4 Feb 2011 | Unregistered CommenterKris

Amazing.....one day when I have no children living at home and money I willl have a beautiful home, minus the golden man between my outdoor chairs.

4 Feb 2011 | Unregistered CommenterHMC

If they're looking for someone to move in right away, I'm your gal!

4 Feb 2011 | Unregistered CommenterTanya

Very nice!

4 Feb 2011 | Unregistered CommenterTom

I much prefer the architect's aesthetic. That courtyard is devine!

Am I missing something here re: the changes to the dining room? The architect's photo shows only the opposite wall so we can't tell whether the b&w wallpaper is up or not. Same floor, same chandelier, same table: the only discernible difference is the chairs. Clue me in!

4 Feb 2011 | Unregistered CommenterLin

I prefer the architect's look myself.

Does anyone know the name of the lights in the kitchen? Love the yellow peeking from underneath .

Thanks :)

Wow, that's a huge difference! I can find myself more in the architects way, but the terrace is great in both ways!

8 Feb 2011 | Unregistered Commenterktrn

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.